Database statistics based on transaction state

ABSTRACT

A computer-implemented method for determining a query execution plan based on transaction state may include determining that a first set of database values in a database table are in a committed transaction state and that a second set of database values in the database table are in an uncommitted transaction state. In response to the determining, the first set of database values may have a first set of statistics generated and the second set of database values may have a second set of statistics generated. The first and second set of statistics may be for use in determining a query execution plan.

BACKGROUND

This disclosure relates generally to database management systems, andmore specifically, to generating database statistics for a queryexecution plan based on a transaction state.

Before query execution, database management systems may employ anoptimizer engine to determine an efficient or most efficient method toaccess data requested from a query statement. For example, a cost-basedoptimizer may generate the best execution plan, which is the plan withthe lowest cost among all other candidate plans. When determining anefficient or most efficient plan to access the requested data, theoptimizer may utilize various column statistics (e.g., frequent valuelists, histograms, cardinality, selectivity, etc.) to track informationabout column values and data distribution within the columns. Thesestatistics may be foundational for determining whether particularexecution plans are implemented.

In some examples, these column statistics may be kept for committedtransactions only. A transaction is one or more operations that make upa unit of work performed against a database. For example, an operationto delete a particular database record (i.e., row) from a table and anoperation to update another database record may be a transaction. When atransaction is committed, the corresponding operation(s) are executedsuccessfully, (e.g., successfully deleting and updating the databaserecords). When a transaction is uncommitted, the transaction is still inprogress and not completed (e.g., a database record is deleted and adatabase record to be updated has not occurred yet). Queries for datamay return database records that are both in a committed and uncommittedtransaction state. Alternatively, queries may return database recordsthat are only in a committed transaction state, depending on the lockingmechanisms (i.e., isolation levels) utilized within the database.

SUMMARY

One or more embodiments are directed to a computer-implemented methodfor determining a query execution plan based on transaction state. Themethod may include determining, by a transaction manager executing on aprocessor, that a first set of database values in a database table arein a committed transaction state and that a second set of databasevalues in the database table are in an uncommitted transaction state. Inresponse to the determining, the method may include generating, by astatistics manager executing on the processor, a first set of statisticsfor the first set of database values and generating a second set ofstatistics for the second set of database values. The first and secondset of statistics may be for use in determining a query execution plan.

One or more embodiments are directed to a system for determining a queryexecution plan based on transaction state. The system may include acomputing device having a processor and a memory. The memory may storeprogram instructions and the program instructions may be executable bythe processor to cause the system to perform the following operations.An operation to determine that a first set of database values in adatabase table are in a committed transaction state and that a secondset of database values in the database table are in an uncommittedtransaction state. In response to the determining, an operation togenerate a first set of statistics for the first set of database valuesand generate a second set of statistics for the second set of databasevalues. The first and second set of statistics may be for use indetermining a query execution plan.

One or more embodiments are directed to a computer program productcomprising a computer readable storage medium. The computer readablestorage medium may include program code embodied therewith. The programcode comprising computer readable program code may be configured fordetermining that a first set of database values in a database table arein a committed transaction state and that a second set of databasevalues in the database table are in an uncommitted transaction state. Inresponse to the determining, the program code comprising computerreadable program code may further be configured for generating a firstset of statistics for the first set of database values and generating asecond set of statistics for the second set of database values. Thefirst and second set of statistics may be for use in determining a queryexecution plan.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

FIG. 1 is a block diagram illustrating an exemplary embodiment of acomputing device that includes a memory.

FIG. 2 is a block diagram illustrating an exemplary embodiment ofcomponents and data that can reside in the memory of FIG. 1, including adatabase manager.

FIG. 3 is flow diagram of an example process for generating statisticsbased on a transaction state, according to embodiments.

FIG. 4A is an example illustration of how frequent values liststatistics may be generated for both committed and uncommitted databasevalues.

FIG. 4B is an example illustration of how the statistics of theuncommitted values of FIG. 4A may be updated after the uncommittedvalues become committed.

FIG. 5 is a flow diagram of a process for determining a query executionplan based on isolation level and corresponding statistics.

FIG. 6A is an example illustration of an index and how committed anduncommitted database values may be tracked, according to embodiments.

FIG. 6B is an example illustration of an index and how committed anduncommitted database values may be tracked, according to embodiments.

While the invention is amenable to various modifications and alternativeforms, specifics thereof have been shown by way of example in thedrawings and will be described in detail. It should be understood,however, that the intention is not to limit the invention to theparticular embodiments described. On the contrary, the intention is tocover all modifications, equivalents, and alternatives falling withinthe spirit and scope of the invention.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION

Aspects of the present disclosure relate generally to databasemanagement systems, and more specifically, to generating databasestatistics for a query execution plan based on transaction state. Whilethe present disclosure is not necessarily limited to such application,various aspects of the disclosure may be appreciated through adiscussion of various examples using this context.

In a multi-user database environment, transactions may be executedsimultaneously. Accordingly, each transaction has the potential tointerfere with any other transaction that is running. Without isolationlevels (i.e., locking mechanisms), various undesirable effects mayoccur. For example, two applications, A and B, may both read the samedatabase record from a database, and both of the applications maycalculate new values for one of its columns based on the data theapplications read. If A updates the database record with its new valueand B then also updates the database record, the update performed by Amay be lost. In another example, application A may update a value in adatabase, and application B may read that value before the value wascommitted. If the value of A is not later committed (i.e., it isuncommitted and is rolled back), the calculations performed by B arebased on uncommitted and presumably invalid data. Therefore, a databasemanager may manage concurrent use of a database through the use ofisolation levels, which determine whether data reads for queries mayinclude both uncommitted transaction data and committed transactiondata.

Queries may return one or more database records that have values in acommitted and uncommitted transaction state (i.e., “dirty” data),depending on the isolation levels utilized. Alternatively, queries mayreturn database record(s) that have values only in a committedtransaction state (i.e., “non-dirty” data), also depending on theisolation levels utilized. In one example, query execution planstatistics may be generated for committed data only, even though a querymay return mostly uncommitted data. This may cause inaccurate statisticsfor calculating accurate query execution plans, which may waste systemresources and lead to delayed throughput by causing poor query executionplans to be implemented. Accordingly, various embodiments of the presentdisclosure are directed to efficiently returning sets database recordsof interest by generating query plan database statistics for bothcommitted and uncommitted database values. The queries that include anisolation level that allows both committed and uncommitted databasevalue reads may use statistics for both committed and uncommitteddatabase values. However, queries that include an isolation level thatallows only for committed database reads, may use statistics only forthe committed data, and not the uncommitted data.

As disclosed herein, the term “set(s)” means one or more. For example, afirst set of database values, means one or more database values. Inanother example, a set of database records means one or more databaserecords. In yet another example, a set of database statistics means oneor more statistics.

FIG. 1 is a block diagram illustrating an exemplary embodiment of acomputing device that includes a memory. The components of the computingdevice 100 can include one or more processors 106, a memory 112, aterminal interface 118, a storage interface 120, an Input/Output (“I/O”)device interface 122, and a network interface 124, all of which arecommunicatively coupled, directly or indirectly, for inter-componentcommunication via a memory bus 110, an I/O bus 116, bus interface unit(“IF”) 108, and an I/O bus interface unit 114.

The computing device 100 may include one or more general-purposeprogrammable central processing units (CPUs) 106A and 106B, hereingenerically referred to as the processor 106. In an embodiment, thecomputing device 100 may contain multiple processors; however, inanother embodiment, the computing device 100 may alternatively be asingle CPU device. Each processor 106 executes instructions stored inthe memory 112.

The computing device 100 may include a bus interface unit 108 to handlecommunications among the processor 106, the memory 112, the displaysystem 104, and the I/O bus interface unit 114. The I/O bus interfaceunit 114 may be coupled with the I/O bus 116 for transferring data toand from the various I/O units. The I/O bus interface unit 114 maycommunicate with multiple I/O interface units 118, 120, 122, and 124,which are also known as I/O processors (IOPs) or I/O adapters (IOAs),through the I/O bus 116. The display system 104 may include a displaycontroller, a display memory, or both. The display controller mayprovide video, audio, or both types of data to a display device 102. Thedisplay memory may be a dedicated memory for buffering video data. Thedisplay system 104 may be coupled with a display device 102, such as astandalone display screen, computer monitor, television, a tablet orhandheld device display, or another other displayable device. In anembodiment, the display device 102 may include one or more speakers forrendering audio. Alternatively, one or more speakers for rendering audiomay be coupled with an I/O interface unit. In alternate embodiments, oneor more functions provided by the display system 104 may be on board anintegrated circuit that also includes the processor 106. In addition,one or more of the functions provided by the bus interface unit 108 maybe on board an integrated circuit that also includes the processor 106.

The I/O interface units support communication with a variety of storageand I/O devices. For example, the terminal interface unit 118 supportsthe attachment of one or more user I/O devices, which may include useroutput devices (such as a video display devices, speaker, and/ortelevision set) and user input devices (such as a keyboard, mouse,keypad, touchpad, trackball, buttons, light pen, or other pointingdevices). A user may manipulate the user input devices using a userinterface, in order to provide input data and commands to the user I/Odevice 126 and the computing device 100, may receive output data via theuser output devices. For example, a user interface may be presented viathe user I/O device 126, such as displayed on a display device, playedvia a speaker, or printed via a printer.

The storage interface 120 supports the attachment of one or more diskdrives or direct access storage devices 128 (which are typicallyrotating magnetic disk drive storage devices, although they couldalternatively be other storage devices, including arrays of disk drivesconfigured to appear as a single large storage device to a hostcomputer, or solid-state drives, such as a flash memory). In anotherembodiment, the storage device 128 may be implemented via any type ofsecondary storage device. The contents of the memory 112, or any portionthereof, may be stored to and retrieved from the storage device 128 asneeded. The I/O device interface 122 provides an interface to any ofvarious other I/O devices or devices of other types, such as printers orfax machines. The network interface 124 provides one or morecommunication paths from the computing device 100 to other digitaldevices and computer systems.

Although the computing device 100 shown in FIG. 1 illustrates aparticular bus structure providing a direct communication path among theprocessors 106, the memory 112, the bus interface 108, the displaysystem 104, and the I/O bus interface unit 114, in alternativeembodiments the computing device 100 may include different buses orcommunication paths, which may be arranged in any of various forms, suchas point-to-point links in hierarchical, star or web configurations,multiple hierarchical buses, parallel and redundant paths, or any otherappropriate type of configuration. Furthermore, while the I/O businterface unit 114 and the I/O bus 108 are shown as single respectiveunits, the computing device 100, may include multiple I/O bus interfaceunits 114 and/or multiple I/O buses 116. While multiple I/O interfaceunits are shown, which separate the I/O bus 116 from variouscommunication paths running to the various I/O devices, in otherembodiments, some or all of the I/O devices are connected directly toone or more system I/O buses.

In various embodiments, the computing device 100 is a multi-usermainframe computer system, a single-user system, or a server computer orsimilar device that has little or no direct user interface, but receivesrequests from other computer systems (clients). In other embodiments,the computing device 100 may be implemented as a desktop computer,portable computer, laptop or notebook computer, tablet computer, pocketcomputer, telephone, smart phone, or any other suitable type ofelectronic device.

In an embodiment, the memory 112 may include a random-accesssemiconductor memory, storage device, or storage medium (either volatileor non-volatile) for storing or encoding data and programs. In anotherembodiment, the memory 112 represents the entire virtual memory of thecomputing device 100, and may also include the virtual memory of othercomputer systems coupled to the computing device 100 or connected via anetwork 130. The memory 112 may be a single monolithic entity, but inother embodiments the memory 112 may include a hierarchy of caches andother memory devices. For example, memory may exist in multiple levelsof caches, and these caches may be further divided by function, so thatone cache holds instructions while another holds non-instruction data,which is used by the processor. Memory 112 may be further distributedand associated with different CPUs or sets of CPUs, as is known in anyvarious so-called non-uniform memory access (NUMA) computerarchitectures.

The memory 112 may store all or a portion of the components and datashown in FIG. 2. These programs and data structures are illustrated inFIG. 2 as being included within the memory 112 in the computing device100; however, in other embodiments, some or all of them may be ondifferent computer systems and may be accessed remotely, e.g., via anetwork 130. The computing device 100 may use virtual addressingmechanisms that allow the programs of the computing device 100 to behaveas if they only have access to a large, single storage entity instead ofaccess to multiple, smaller storage entities. Thus, while the componentsand data shown in FIG. 2 are illustrated as being included within thememory 112, these components and data are not necessarily all completelycontained in the same storage device at the same time. Although thecomponents and data shown in FIG. 2 are illustrated as being separateentities, in other embodiments some of them, portions of some of them,or all of them may be packaged together.

In an embodiment, the components and data shown in FIG. 2 may includeinstructions or statements that execute on the processor 106 orinstructions or statements that are interpreted by instructions orstatements that execute the processor 106 to carry out the functions asfurther described below. In another embodiment, the components shown inFIG. 2 may be implemented in hardware via semiconductor devices, chips,logical gates, circuits, circuit cards, and/or other physical hardwaredevices in lieu of, or in addition to, a processor-based system. In anembodiment, the components shown in FIG. 2 may include data in additionto instructions or statements.

FIG. 1 is intended to depict representative components of the computingdevice 100. Individual components, however, may have greater complexitythan represented in FIG. 1. In FIG. 1, components other than or inaddition to those shown may be present, and the number, type, andconfiguration of such components may vary. Several particular examplesof additional complexity or additional variations are disclosed herein;these are by way of example only and are not necessarily the only suchvariations. The various program components illustrated in FIG. 1 may beimplemented, in various embodiments, in a number of different ways,including using various computer applications, routines, components,programs, objects, modules, data structures etc., which may be referredto herein as “software,” “computer programs,” or simply “programs.”

FIG. 2 is a block diagram illustrating an exemplary embodiment ofcomponents and data that can reside in the memory of FIG. 1, including adatabase manager 202. In an embodiment, the database manager 202 mayinclude a query processor 204 and a storage engine 206, which mayinteract with a storage device 128 to retrieve data within a databasefile. The query processor 204 may include an optimizer engine 208 and astatistics manager 214. The storage engine 206 may include a transactionmanager 210 and isolation level manager 212. In various embodiments,these components and data may be program instructions that are part of asystem and executable by a processor of a computing device to cause thesystem to determine that a first set of database values in a databasetable are in a committed transaction state and that a second set ofdatabase values in the database table are in an uncommitted transactionstate. These components and data are also operable to generating a firstset of statistics for the first set of database values and generating asecond set of statistics for the second set of database values. Thefirst and second set of statistics are used for determining a queryexecution plan.

Consistent with some embodiments, a user may issue a query 200 and thedatabase manager 202 may receive the query 200 to retrieve one or moredatabase records from a database file within the storage device 128. Forexample, the query 200 may specify inserting multiple database recordsto a database file. The query 200 may be written in any suitable querylanguage that corresponds to the desired database type. For example, thequery 200 may be written in structured query language (SQL) forrelational databases, data manipulation language (DML) for inserting,updating, or deleting database records in relational databases,multidimensional expression (MDX) for multidimensional or onlineanalytical procession (OLAP) databases, or any other language for anyother database.

In embodiments, the database manager 202 may initiate the process ofselecting the one or more database records that are being requested fromthe query 200 by utilizing the query processor 204. In an embodiments,query processor 204 may generate several plans to access databaserecords and execute the most efficient plan. Alternatively, the queryprocessor 204 may generate an efficient plan, which is not necessarilythe most efficient. The query processor 204 may include such componentsas a compiler, a parser engine, an optimizer engine 208, and anexecution engine. A compiler may receive the query 200 and convert thequery 200 into machine-readable object code.

The parser engine may receive the compiled query 200 and check that thequery 200 is correctly specified, resolve names and references, andconvert the query 200 into a format utilized by the optimizer engine208. The parser engine may convert the query 200 into a data structure,which gives a structural representation of the query 200. For example,the data structure may be an abstract syntax tree, parse tree, or otherdata structure. In various embodiments, the parser engine may make aplurality of checks, including a syntax check, a check determiningwhether the query 200 is meaningful, and a shared pool check.

In various embodiments, the optimizer engine 208 may receive the parsedquery 200 to determine an efficient or most efficient query executionplan of selecting the one or more database records based on whichdatabase record(s) are requested in the query 200. In other embodiments,other database manager 202 modules may determine a query execution plan.In embodiments, an optimizer engine 208 may determine the cost of eachquery execution plan through an estimator. In an embodiment, anestimator may estimate the cost of each query execution plan bymeasuring the units of work or resources used. For example, theestimator may use disk I/O, central processing unit (CPU) usage, andmemory usage to calculate units of work. The cost of a query executionplan may accordingly represent a number of work units that are expectedto be absorbed when the query 200 is executed and the results produced.In some embodiments, to arrive at a final cost estimation, the estimatormay use such measurement statistics as cardinality and selectivity.Cardinality may be the number of unique values in a given column orcolumns of a table. Selectivity internally calculates the percentage ofdatabase records that will be selected in a database record set based onthe query 200. The estimator may also utilize a frequent value list,which provides the distribution level of all of the values, includingthe most frequent values for any given column or set of columns.

According to some embodiments, in order to calculate cardinality,selectivity, frequent value lists or other query execution planstatistics, the optimizer engine 208 may communicate with the statisticsmanager 214, which may be responsible for organizing and calculating allof the needed statistics. In embodiments, after the statistics manager214 makes appropriate calculations, the optimizer engine 208 may utilizethe statistics needed for a query execution plan. Other statistics thatthe statistics manager 214 or optimizer engine 208 may utilize for queryexecution plans are one-dimensional value distributions such as simplehistograms or density functions. Histograms may be a grouping of all ofthe values of a column in logical buckets or groups. In variousexamples, a simple histogram may be generated before query requests aremade. In another example, a simple histogram may also be generated bycreating them as needed (“salt and pepper” approach). In yet anotherexample, a simple histogram may be built for all columns (“over killhammer” approach). In various embodiments, the simple histogram type maybe frequency, top frequency, height-based, hybrid, or other simplehistogram configurations. In various embodiments, the optimizer engine208 or statistics manager 214 utilizes several different mechanisms togather data for simple histogram preparation such as data sampling,direct queries that verify the number of database records for a givenbucket range of values (also referred to as intervals or periods),modification of insertion, deletion operations to update the simplehistogram matrix, or any other data gathering mechanism. In otherexamples, the histograms may be multidimensional or multicolumnhistograms.

In various embodiments of the present disclosure, the statistics manager214 may be responsible for generating statistics for a set of databasevalues in a committed state and a set of database values in anuncommitted state, as described more below. The statistics may be usedfor determining a query execution plan.

In embodiments, after the statistics have been generated and theoptimizer engine 208 generates an efficient or most efficient queryexecution plan, the execution engine may execute the query 200 againstthe storage device 128. The execution engine may also order tables inany particular join order according to any join method, which is chosenby the optimizer engine 208. For example, the execution engine may run anested loop, sort merge, or hash method as its chosen join method.

In various embodiments, the storage engine 206 may use the chosen queryexecution plan from the query processor 204 to select one or moredatabase records from a database file in the storage device 128. Inother embodiments, the one or more database records may be cached orbuffered in the memory 112, and may therefore be selected from thememory 112. In some embodiments, the storage engine 206 may be a part ofthe execution engine of the query processor 204. The storage engine 206may provide interface between low level data stored in database files ofa storage device 128 and higher level applications. The storage engine206 may interface with the database files by translating various querystatements into low-level file system commands. For example, the storageengine 206 may be responsible for selecting one or more database recordsfrom a database file in order for a delete operation to occur. In someembodiments, the storage engine 206 may actually select the one or moredatabase records via an operating system component (e.g., disk manager).

The transaction manager 210 may be responsible for coordinating varioustransactions within the storage device 128. In some embodiments, thetransaction manager 210 may determine whether the one or more databaserecords are in a committed transaction state or uncommitted transactionstate. In other embodiments, another database manager 202 module maydetermine whether the one or more database records are in an uncommittedor committed transaction state (e.g., log manager). A transaction is oneor more operations that make up a unit of work performed against astorage device 128. For example, a transaction may include the I/Ooperations of reading one or more database records, and updating thevalues of the database records. The information about the reading andupdating operations may be stored to a transaction log. A transactionlog (also known as a journal, journal receiver, commit log, etc.) is alog that records various operations in a transaction as they occur inreal time. For example, a transaction manager 210 (or log manager) maywrite to a transaction log specifying that the reading and updatingoperations occurred at a particular time. This may be done to record thespecific point in time such transaction took place in case of datarecovery at a later time. In various embodiments, a transaction may bein multiple states. For example, the transaction may be in in activestate (uncommitted). In an active state, a transaction has begun and iscurrently being executed by the transaction manager 210, which may bethe initial state of every transaction. The transaction may also be in apartially committed (uncommitted) state. In a partially committed state,the transaction manager 210 has executed its final operation withoutperforming various checks (e.g., the consistency state of a storagedevice 128 after applying output of the transaction on the storagedevice 128). The transaction may be in a committed state. If thetransaction manager 210 executes all of its operations successfully,which includes successfully performing various checks, then thetransaction may be in a committed state. Accordingly, all of thecommitted transactions may permanently be applied to the storage device128. The transaction may also be in a failed (uncommitted) state. If anychecks made fail, the transaction may be in a failed state such that thetransaction can no longer proceed. If any of the checks fail, and thetransaction is in a failed state, the recovery manager (not shown) ortransaction manager 210 may “rollback” any uncommitted transactions toplace the storage device 128 in a state prior to the start of theexecution of the transaction, which is called an aborted state (e.g.,re-start transaction). Consistent with some embodiments, when thetransaction is in an uncommitted state, the transaction manager 210 maygenerate data to be placed in a log record and request a log manager towrite the contents of the log record to a transaction log of the storagedevice 128.

In one or more embodiments, an isolation level manager 212 may beutilized to determine whether data includes an isolation level thatallows a read for the database values based on a query request. In someembodiments however, another database manager 202 module may performthese functions (e.g., lock manager). In embodiments, an isolation levelis a locking mechanism utilized by a lock manager to lock for a query,one or more data objects (e.g., database records) that are part of atransaction that is in the process of being completed. This may be a wayto manage concurrency such that the database manager 202 may handlesimultaneous transactions involving the same data. Accordingly, theisolation level may determine whether database values in an uncommittedand committed transaction state can both be accessed for a particularquery request.

Consistent with various embodiments, there may be many isolation levelsfor the data in a database file. For example, one isolation level is a“No Commitment” (NC) isolation level. For the NC isolation level, commitand rollback operations may have no effect on query requests.Accordingly, both uncommitted and committed database record(s) may bereturned to a user because there may be no locks placed on thecorresponding database record(s).

In some embodiments, the isolation level manager 212 may determine thatan “Uncommitted Read” (UR) isolation level is included for the data.This may also be known as a “dirty read” level. UR isolation leveltransactions may include very few locks. Accordingly, transactions maynot wait for a lock manager to release locks. In this isolation level,just like NC isolation level, both uncommitted and committed databaserecords may be retrieved from a query.

In embodiments, the isolation level manager 212 may determine thatqueried data includes a “Cursor Stability” (CS) isolation level. Thisisolation level may allow for locking any database record on which acursor (e.g., pointer) is positioned during a transaction. A cursor is adata structure that may allow retrieval or removal of a database record.The lock on the database record may be held until the next databaserecord is fetched or the transaction is terminated. For example, thetransaction may include the retrieval of a database record, the deletingof it, and inserting of another database record. After the entiretransaction is finished, the lock may then be released. In theseembodiments, a transaction may be terminated when either a commit (asspecified in the example above) or rollback is executed. Accordingly,only committed transaction state database records may be retrieved by aquery for the CS isolation level.

In some embodiments, the isolation level manager 212 may determine thatqueried data includes a “Read Stability” (RS) isolation level. The RSisolation level may lock those database records that are part of aresult set. For example, if a table contains 10,000 database records anda query returns 10 rows, then only 10 rows may be locked until the endof a transaction. Accordingly, instead of locking a single databaserecord, it may lock all database records that are part of a result set.The RS isolation level may therefore only allow for a query read ofcommitted database records.

In various embodiments, the isolation level manager 212 may utilize a“Repeatable Read” (RR) isolation level. The RR isolation level may allowfor the locking of all the rows than an application references within aunit of work, no matter how large the result set is. For example, anapplication may reference an entire table of database records within aunit of work and may have a corresponding lock on the entire table. TheRR isolation level may also not allow for a query read of anyuncommitted data. The RR isolation level may also ensure repeatablereads to applications. Therefore, a repeated query may get the samedatabase record set as long as it is executed in the same transaction.The isolation level manager 212 (or a lock manager) may use thesevarious isolation levels (e.g., CS, RS, and RR isolation levels) toprohibit queries from accessing uncommitted data requested by otherqueries (except for NC and UR isolation levels) and to prohibit theupdating of database records by other transactions when a lock owningtransaction is using a restrictive isolation level.

FIG. 3 is flow diagram of an example process 300 for generatingstatistics based on a transaction state, according to embodiments. Theprocess 300 may begin with operation 302 when a statistics manager oroptimizer samples values of one or more database records. Accordingly,the statistics manager or optimizer may select various database recordswithin a table of a database. The database records may include databasevalues. In operation 304, the statistics manager or optimizer maydetermine whether the sampled database values are in a committed oruncommitted transaction state. This determination may be performedaccording to various embodiments. For example, operation 304 may bebased on reading a transaction log, the transaction log storingtransaction data. In embodiments, a transaction log stored in memory mayonly include uncommitted operations that make up a transaction.Therefore, the database manager may determine that various sampledvalues are included in a transaction log thereby allowing an inferencethat the sampled data is uncommitted. Alternatively, the databasemanager may determine that the various sampled values are not includedin the transaction log thereby allowing for an inference that thesampled data is in a committed transaction state.

In some embodiments, operation 304 may be based on reading the databasetable input/output operations. For example, a database manager may readan “update” operation on a database table, and determine that thecorresponding transaction remains active (e.g., a user has not performeda “delete” operation yet). Accordingly, the database manager maydetermine that the data for the “update” operation may be in anuncommitted transaction state. In some embodiments, operation 304 may bebased on reading a column value of a column on an index object. Theindex object table may include committed and uncommitted databasevalues. The column value may specify whether the database values are ina committed transaction state or uncommitted transaction state. Thisembodiment is described in more detail in FIG. 6 below.

If the sampled database values are in a committed transaction state,then a statistics manager or optimizer may perform operation 306 byadding the sampled values to a committed values pool, as discussedabove. In embodiments, once the values are added to the committed valuespool, operation 310 may be performed to determine whether a sample ofmore values is needed. In operation 304, if the sampled values are notin a committed transaction state (i.e., the values are in an uncommittedtransaction state), then the statistics manager or optimizer may performoperation 308 by adding the sampled values to an uncommitted valuespool, as described above. When the sampled values are added to theuncommitted values pool, a statistics manager or optimizer may performoperation 310 to determine whether any more values need to be sampled.If there are more values that need to be sampled (e.g., because not allof the values in a database file have been sampled), then operations 302and 304 may be repeated, and possibly 306 or 308. If no more values needto be sampled according to operation 310 (e.g., because all of thevalues in a table have been sampled), then the statistics manager oroptimizer may perform operation 312 to generate statistics for the datavalues that are in the committed values pool (operation 306) andgenerate statistics for the data that are in the uncommitted values pool(operation 308). For example, histograms or frequent value liststatistics may be generated for the pooled data, as described below inFIG. 5.

FIG. 4A is an example illustration of how frequent values liststatistics may be generated for both committed and uncommitted databasevalues. A frequent value list may be a column statistic that determinesa quantity range of each value within a column of a table (e.g., thename Joe is listed 10 times in the name column, so the range is 10). Insome embodiments, the frequent value list may be a statistic thatdetermines a quantity of times each value has been queried for eachcolumn. FIG. 4A includes a committed values pool (i.e., 402A, 404A,406A, and 408A) and a corresponding uncommitted values pool (i.e., 402B,404B, 406B, and 408B). Value pairs 402A and 402B may be considered to bethe same value (e.g., the name “John”), but a part of different valuespools. Value pairs 404A and 404B, 406A and 406B, 408A and 408B mayfollow the same principle of being the same values, but in separatevalues pools.

In this illustrative example of FIG. 4A, a query statement may requestall of the values within column 406A and/or 406B that correspond to thefirst set of database records (e.g., SELECT*FROM MY_Table WHERECOL1=406). In an example, if the query includes a request for all of the406 values (i.e., 406A and 406B), but the values include an isolationlevel (e.g., CS, RS, or RR) that does not allow a read or retrieval ofuncommitted values (i.e., 406B), then the optimizer may utilizestatistics only for the committed values (i.e., 406A). Accordingly, thestatistics estimate for frequent value list of column 406 may be 50values returned (adding the frequency of values for 406A only and not406B). However, if the values include an isolation level (e.g., NC orUR) that allows a read or retrieval of both committed and uncommittedvalues, then the statistics estimate for value 406 may be 10 databaserecords, as represented by: 406A+406B (50+−40=10). In this latterexample, the frequent value list statistic may be computed by addingcommit and uncommitted sections of the statistic. In embodiments, thenegative values (e.g., −40 (406B)) may correspond to a delete or updateoperation of values.

For a further example, if it is assumed that an isolation level allowsfor both uncommitted and committed data reads, 402A committed valuequantity range at 100 may be added with 402B uncommitted value frequencyto arrive at an estimation of 140 (100+40) value frequency for thecolumn. In yet another example (assuming the same isolation level), 408Avalue frequency may be 20, which may be added with the corresponding408B uncommitted value frequency to arrive at an estimation of 40(20+20).

FIG. 4B is an example illustration of how the statistics of theuncommitted values of FIG. 4A may be updated after the uncommittedvalues become committed. In FIG. 4B, because all of the uncommittedvalues (402B, 404B, 406B, and 408B) have all become committed (i.e., thetransactions have completed), there is a quantity range value of zero,as there are no more uncommitted values. The calculation for thecommitted values pool in FIG. 4B may be calculated by adding thecommitted values of FIG. 4A with the corresponding uncommitted values ofFIG. 4A. For example, 402A of FIG. 4A (100)+402B of FIG. 4A (40)=402A ofFIG. 4B (140). In another example, 404A of FIG. 4A (60)+404B of FIG. 4A(10)=404A of FIG. 4B (70). The significance of FIG. 4B is that queriesfor data subject to isolation levels that allow data reads only forcommitted data may have vastly different statistics when the uncommittedvalues become committed. When the uncommitted values become committed,the optimizer may need to re-optimize a query execution plan, asdescribed in more detail in FIG. 5 below.

FIG. 5 is a flow diagram of a process 500 for determining a queryexecution plan based on isolation level and corresponding statistics.The process 500 may start when the database manager performs operation502 by receiving a query request from a user specifying what particulardatabase record(s) the user wants returned. A transaction manager, indexmanager, or other database manager component, as described above (and inFIGS. 6A and 6B below), may then perform operation 504 to determinewhether the requested database record(s) are in an uncommittedtransaction state. If the database record(s) are not in an uncommittedtransaction state (i.e., they are in a committed transaction state bynot being subject to any other pending transaction), then operation 508may be performed, which is described below.

If the database record(s) include values that that are in an uncommittedtransaction state, then an isolation manager may perform operation 510to determine if an isolation level allows uncommitted transaction datareads. If the isolation level allows uncommitted data reads (e.g., NC orUR), then the optimizer may perform operation 506 to use both committedand uncommitted statistics for determining a query execution plan. Forexample, referring back to FIG. 4A, the optimizer may use both theuncommitted values pool and the committed values pool statistics for thecorresponding values, as discussed above. In some embodiments, there maybe a re-optimization of the determined query execution plan in operation506 (similar to operation 514) because of a change in statisticalmeasures. In other embodiments, the process 500 may end after operation506. In operation 504, if the isolation level does not allow uncommitteddata reads (i.e., it allows committed transaction state data reads onlyfor retrieving the data), then an optimizer may perform operation 508 touse committed statistics only for determining a query execution plan.For example, referring back to FIG. 4A, the optimizer may only use thecommitted values pool, as discussed above.

In some embodiments, the optimizer may perform operation 512 todetermine if the committed statistics have changed above a threshold.For example, using the illustration of FIG. 4A and FIG. 4B above,committed statistics may have greatly changed over time for the samevalues, thereby warranting a change in a query execution plan. If at afirst time, a user issues a query for value 406 only, but the isolationlevel only allows committed data reads, then value 406A may only beutilized for the statistic (i.e., estimate of 50) because 406B is notcommitted. However, at a second time, 406B may change to becomecommitted. If 406B becomes committed, and the isolation level stillallows committed data reads, then the statistics may be updated suchthat the estimate for 406 may be vastly different—an estimate of 10, asopposed to 50 (50+−40). Accordingly, the optimizer may decide that thestatistics have changed above or below a threshold value (e.g., changein + or −30 in quantity value estimation when statistics becomecommitted). The threshold value may be any suitable value, depending onthe statistic and system resources. In operation 514, an optimizer mayre-optimize or change a query execution plan for the committed data ifthe statistics have changed above or below a threshold, and then theprocess 500 may end. If the committed statistics have not changed abovea threshold in operation 512, then the optimizer may not have tore-optimize a query execution plan (i.e., the original query executionplan may be used in operation 508), and the process 500 may end.

The committed and uncommitted transaction state of database records thatare part of a query may be tracked by a database manager in variousmanners. For example, the database manager may use a transaction log tokeep track of which transactions (which include database values) are ina committed and uncommitted transaction state, as described above. Thedatabase manager may also utilize an index object for determiningwhether data is in a committed or uncommitted transaction state. Thedatabase manager may determine whether a set of database values in adatabase table are in a committed or uncommitted transaction state byreading a column value of a column on an index object. The column valuemay specify that at least one database value is in a committedtransaction state, and at least one database value is in an uncommittedtransactions state.

FIG. 6A is an example illustration of an index object and how committedand uncommitted database values may be tracked, according toembodiments. FIG. 6A illustrates a “Commit Flag” (bit or byte) Columnwithin the index object, which may be utilized to determine whichdatabase records are committed or uncommitted. The “C” value may be usedto represent database values that are in a committed transaction state.The “U” value may be used to represent database values that are in anuncommitted transaction state. The “Column 1” column illustrates variousdatabase record values (A, B, C, and D) within a particular column.

In some embodiments, as shown if FIG. 6A, if the index object is usedwhen the isolation level does not allow for uncommitted transaction datareads (e.g., CS, RS, or RR isolation levels), the “Commit Flag” columnis oriented as the first (i.e., leftmost) column of the index object sothat the data may be cleanly partitioned into uncommitted and committedbranches of the index tree for runtime and returning database records.In some embodiments, the first column of the index object determines howbranches of a corresponding index tree are organized. For example, thefirst 8 rows of values of the “Commit Flag” column of FIG. 6A may bepartitioned into a branch of an index tree, which includes all of thecommitted database values. One branch of the index tree may also includeall of the uncommitted database values. In embodiments, the first columnof the index object may correspond to a root node level key of arespective index tree. In these embodiments, the root node level key isthe starting key.

FIG. 6B is also an example illustration of an index object and howcommitted and uncommitted database values may be tracked, according toembodiments. FIG. 6B, illustrates that the “Column 1” column is orientedin a leftmost or first position in an index object and the “Commit Flag”column is oriented in a rightmost position or last column within theindex object. This orientation may occur when the queried data includesan isolation level that allows both uncommitted and committedtransaction data reads (e.g., the isolation levels are UR or NC).Accordingly, all of the database records may be accessed by a query andso partitioning the commit and uncommitted database records into groupsmay have no advantageous effect for query results. In some embodiments,the last column in the index object may correspond to leaf node levelkeys in a corresponding index tree. In FIGS. 6A and 6B, the respectiveindexes may be optimized for the primary runtime use, but the indexstatistics (e.g., estimate key range, cardinality, etc.) can still begiven for queries which are outside of the primary runtime usage. Forexample, if an isolation level for the data does not allow uncommitteddata reads, a statistics manager may still give statistics estimates foruncommitted database records. In these embodiments, the query optimizermay apply an internal query to at least a portion of the query. Forexample, the query may be: “CommitFlag IN (‘U’, ‘C’),” which may be astatistical query for all of the committed and uncommitted databaserecords, or “CommitFlag IN (‘C’),” which may be a statistical query foronly the committed database records.

The present invention may be a system, a method, and/or a computerprogram product. The computer program product may include a computerreadable storage medium (or media) having computer readable programinstructions thereon for causing a processor to carry out aspects of thevarious embodiments.

The computer readable storage medium can be a tangible device that canretain and store instructions for use by an instruction executiondevice. The computer readable storage medium may be, for example, but isnot limited to, an electronic storage device, a magnetic storage device,an optical storage device, an electromagnetic storage device, asemiconductor storage device, or any suitable combination of theforegoing. A non-exhaustive list of more specific examples of thecomputer readable storage medium includes the following: a portablecomputer diskette, a hard disk, a random access memory (RAM), aread-only memory (ROM), an erasable programmable read-only memory (EPROMor Flash memory), a static random access memory (SRAM), a portablecompact disc read-only memory (CD-ROM), a digital versatile disk (DVD),a memory stick, a floppy disk, a mechanically encoded device such aspunch-cards or raised structures in a groove having instructionsrecorded thereon, and any suitable combination of the foregoing. Acomputer readable storage medium, as used herein, is not to be construedas being transitory signals per se, such as radio waves or other freelypropagating electromagnetic waves, electromagnetic waves propagatingthrough a waveguide or other transmission media (e.g., light pulsespassing through a fiber-optic cable), or electrical signals transmittedthrough a wire.

Computer readable program instructions described herein can bedownloaded to respective computing/processing devices from a computerreadable storage medium or to an external computer or external storagedevice via a network, for example, the Internet, a local area network, awide area network and/or a wireless network. The network may comprisecopper transmission cables, optical transmission fibers, wirelesstransmission, routers, firewalls, switches, gateway computers and/oredge servers. A network adapter card or network interface in eachcomputing/processing device receives computer readable programinstructions from the network and forwards the computer readable programinstructions for storage in a computer readable storage medium withinthe respective computing/processing device.

Computer readable program instructions for carrying out operations ofembodiments of the present invention may be assembler instructions,instruction-set-architecture (ISA) instructions, machine instructions,machine dependent instructions, microcode, firmware instructions,state-setting data, or either source code or object code written in anycombination of one or more programming languages, including an objectoriented programming language such as Smalltalk, C++ or the like, andconventional procedural programming languages, such as the “C”programming language or similar programming languages. The computerreadable program instructions may execute entirely on the user'scomputer, partly on the user's computer, as a stand-alone softwarepackage, partly on the user's computer and partly on a remote computeror entirely on the remote computer or server. In the latter scenario,the remote computer may be connected to the user's computer through anytype of network, including a local area network (LAN) or a wide areanetwork (WAN), or the connection may be made to an external computer(for example, through the Internet using an Internet Service Provider).In some embodiments, electronic circuitry including, for example,programmable logic circuitry, field-programmable gate arrays (FPGA), orprogrammable logic arrays (PLA) may execute the computer readableprogram instructions by utilizing state information of the computerreadable program instructions to personalize the electronic circuitry,in order to perform aspects of embodiments of the present invention.

Aspects of the present invention are described herein with reference toflowchart illustrations and/or block diagrams of methods, apparatus(systems), and computer program products according to embodiments of theinvention. It will be understood that each block of the flowchartillustrations and/or block diagrams, and combinations of blocks in theflowchart illustrations and/or block diagrams, can be implemented bycomputer readable program instructions.

These computer readable program instructions may be provided to aprocessor of a general purpose computer, special purpose computer, orother programmable data processing apparatus to produce a machine, suchthat the instructions, which execute via the processor of the computeror other programmable data processing apparatus, create means forimplementing the functions/acts specified in the flowchart and/or blockdiagram block or blocks. These computer readable program instructionsmay also be stored in a computer readable storage medium that can directa computer, a programmable data processing apparatus, and/or otherdevices to function in a particular manner, such that the computerreadable storage medium having instructions stored therein comprises anarticle of manufacture including instructions which implement aspects ofthe function/act specified in the flowchart and/or block diagram blockor blocks.

The computer readable program instructions may also be loaded onto acomputer, other programmable data processing apparatus, or other deviceto cause a series of operational steps to be performed on the computer,other programmable apparatus or other device to produce a computerimplemented process, such that the instructions which execute on thecomputer, other programmable apparatus, or other device implement thefunctions/acts specified in the flowchart and/or block diagram block orblocks.

The flowchart and block diagrams in the Figures illustrate thearchitecture, functionality, and operation of possible implementationsof systems, methods, and computer program products according to variousembodiments of the present invention. In this regard, each block in theflowchart or block diagrams may represent a module, segment, or portionof instructions, which comprises one or more executable instructions forimplementing the specified logical function(s). In some alternativeimplementations, the functions noted in the block may occur out of theorder noted in the Figures. For example, two blocks shown in successionmay, in fact, be executed substantially concurrently, or the blocks maysometimes be executed in the reverse order, depending upon thefunctionality involved. It will also be noted that each block of theblock diagrams and/or flowchart illustration, and combinations of blocksin the block diagrams and/or flowchart illustration, can be implementedby special purpose hardware-based systems that perform the specifiedfunctions or acts or carry out combinations of special purpose hardwareand computer instructions.

The descriptions of the various embodiments of the present inventionhave been presented for purposes of illustration, but are not intendedto be exhaustive or limited to the embodiments disclosed. Manymodifications and variations will be apparent to those of ordinary skillin the art without departing from the scope and spirit of the describedembodiments. The terminology used herein was chosen to explain theprinciples of the embodiments, the practical application or technicalimprovement over technologies found in the marketplace, or to enableothers of ordinary skill in the art to understand the embodimentsdisclosed herein.

What is claimed is:
 1. A computer-implemented method for determining aquery execution plan based on transaction state, comprising:determining, by a transaction manager executing on a processor, that afirst set of database values in a database table are in a committedtransaction state and that a second set of database values in thedatabase table are in an uncommitted transaction state; in response tothe determining, generating, by a statistics manager executing on theprocessor, a first set of statistics for the first set of databasevalues and generating a second set of statistics for the second set ofdatabase values, the first and second set of statistics for use indetermining a query execution plan; and returning, using the queryexecuting plan, one or more database records of interest.
 2. The methodof claim 1, further comprising: receiving a query request to access afirst set of database records that includes at least one of the firstset of database values and at least one of the second set of databasevalues; determining, by an isolation level manager executing on theprocessor, that an isolation level allows a read of the first and secondset of database values, wherein the isolation level determines whetherdatabase values in an uncommitted transaction state and database valuesin a committed transaction state can both be accessed for a particularquery request; and in response to the determining that an isolationlevel allows a read of the first and second set of database values,using at least one of the first set of statistics and at least one ofthe second set of statistics, by an optimizer engine executing on theprocessor, to determine a query execution plan for accessing the firstset of database records.
 3. The method of claim 1, further comprising:receiving a first query request to access a first set of databaserecords that includes at least one of the first set of database valuesand at least one of the second set of database values; determining, byan isolation level manager executing on the processor, that an isolationlevel only allows a read of the first set of database values; and usingat least one of the first set of statistics, by an optimizer engineexecuting on the processor, for the at least one of the first set ofdatabase values to determine a first query execution plan, wherein thesecond set of statistics for the second set of database values are notused.
 4. The method of claim 3, further comprising: changing, by thetransaction manager, the uncommitted transaction state of the at leastone of the second set of database values to a committed transactionstate; in response to the changing, updating, by the statistics manager,the at least one of first set of statistics by generating a third set ofstatistics and updating at least one of the second set of statistics bygenerating a fourth set of statistics; receiving a second query requestto access a second set of database records that includes the at leastone of the first set of database values and the at least one of thesecond set of database values that have been changed to the committedtransaction state; determining, by the isolation level manager, that anisolation level allows a read of the first set of database values andthe at least one of the second set of database values that have beenchanged to the committed transaction state; and using the third andfourth set of statistics, by the optimizer engine, to change the firstquery execution plan to a second query execution plan.
 5. The method ofclaim 1, wherein the determining that a first set of database values ina database table are in a committed transaction state and determiningthat a second set of database values in the database table are in anuncommitted transaction state is based on reading a transaction log, thetransaction log storing transaction data.
 6. The method of claim 1,wherein the determining that a first set of database values in adatabase table are in a committed transaction state and that a secondset of database values in the database table are in an uncommittedtransaction state is based on reading the database table input/outputoperations.
 7. The method of claim 1, wherein the first set ofstatistics and the second set of statistics include at least one of: ahistogram, cardinality, frequent value list, or selectivity statistics.8. The method of claim 1, wherein determining, by the transactionmanager executing on the processor, that the first set of databasevalues in the database table are in the committed transaction state isbased on reading a first column value specifying that the first set ofdatabase values are in the committed transaction state and whereindetermining, that the second set of database values in the databasetable are in the uncommitted transaction state is based on reading asecond column value specifying that the second set of database valuesare in the uncommitted transaction state.
 9. A computer program productcomprising a computer readable storage medium having programinstructions embodied therewith, the program instructions executable bya processor to cause the processor to perform a method for determining aquery execution plan based on transaction state comprising: determining,by a transaction manager executing on a processor, that a first set ofdatabase values in a database table are in a committed transaction stateand that a second set of database values in the database table are in anuncommitted transaction state; in response to the determining,generating, by a statistics manager executing on the processor, a firstset of statistics for the first set of database values and generating asecond set of statistics for the second set of database values, thefirst and second set of statistics for use in determining a queryexecution plan; and returning, using the query executing plan, one ormore database records of interest.
 10. The computer program product ofclaim 9, wherein the method further comprises: receiving a query requestto access a first set of database records that includes at least one ofthe first set of database values and at least one of the second set ofdatabase values; determining, by an isolation level manager executing onthe processor, that an isolation level allows a read of the first andsecond set of database values, wherein the isolation level determineswhether database values in an uncommitted transaction state and databasevalues in a committed transaction state can both be accessed for aparticular query request; and in response to the determining that anisolation level allows a read of the first and second set of databasevalues, using at least one of the first set of statistics and at leastone of the second set of statistics, by an optimizer engine executing onthe processor, to determine a query execution plan for accessing thefirst set of database records.
 11. The computer program product of claim9, wherein the method further comprises: receiving a first query requestto access a first set of database records that includes at least one ofthe first set of database values and at least one of the second set ofdatabase values; determining, by an isolation level manager executing onthe processor, that an isolation level only allows a read of the firstset of database values; and using at least one of the first set ofstatistics, by an optimizer engine executing on the processor, for theat least one of the first set of database values to determine a firstquery execution plan, wherein the second set of statistics for thesecond set of database values are not used.
 12. The computer programproduct of claim 11, wherein the method further comprises: changing, bythe transaction manager, the uncommitted transaction state of the atleast one of the second set of database values to a committedtransaction state; in response to the changing, updating, by thestatistics manager, the at least one of first set of statistics bygenerating a third set of statistics and updating at least one of thesecond set of statistics by generating a fourth set of statistics;receiving a second query request to access a second set of databaserecords that includes the at least one of the first set of databasevalues and the at least one of the second set of database values thathave been changed to the committed transaction state; determining, bythe isolation level manager, that an isolation level allows a read ofthe first set of database values and the at least one of the second setof database values that have been changed to the committed transactionstate; and using the third and fourth set of statistics, by theoptimizer engine, to change the first query execution plan to a secondquery execution plan.
 13. The computer program product of claim 9,wherein the determining that a first set of database values in adatabase table are in a committed transaction state and determining thata second set of database values in the database table are in anuncommitted transaction state is based on reading a transaction log, thetransaction log storing transaction data.
 14. The computer programproduct of claim 9, wherein the determining that a first set of databasevalues in a database table are in a committed transaction state and thata second set of database values in the database table are in anuncommitted transaction state is based on reading the database tableinput/output operations.
 15. The computer program product of claim 9,wherein the first set of statistics and the second set of statisticsinclude at least one of: a histogram, cardinality, frequent value list,or selectivity statistics.
 16. The computer program product of claim 9,wherein determining, by the transaction manager executing on theprocessor, that the first set of database values in the database tableare in the committed transaction state is based on reading a firstcolumn value specifying that the first set of database values are in thecommitted transaction state and wherein determining, that the second setof database values in the database table are in the uncommittedtransaction state is based on reading a second column value specifyingthat the second set of database values are in the uncommittedtransaction state.